Interpersonal relationships exist whether we want
them to or not. Even if we think that we are an island or at least a peninsula,
I guarantee, we interact with and are related to other people---somehow, some
way.
Generally, positive people do not really require explanation or understanding. They make us feel good and we usually respond to their positivity in kind.
UNPLEASANT people, however, are a different story. These people tend to drain the goodness from our very souls.
There is no ONE kind of unpleasant person. Unpleasantness and negativity come in different varieties, like a jar of bad jelly beans.
I think that recognizing the type is the first step in learning how to handle Unpleasant People (UPs) without losing our sense of self, without stressing out too much and of course without "catching a case." You know what they say, "knowing is half the battle."
I hope to provide some insight into their motivation and give a tip or two on how to diffuse any negative situations that we may encounter with them.
Let me emphasize that what I write is my own opinion and nothing here
has necessarily been substantiated by any social scientists, whatsoever.
For the purposes of these next few entries, a "UP" is one who may not be a horrible person all the time, it's just that, their approach to interpersonal interaction leaves more to be desired.
And with that...let me begin:
Entry 1: The
Salem Witch Hunter or the Spanish Inquisitor
Oooh, THIS guy! I call the first UP the "Salem Witch Hunter" or the "Spanish Inquisitor" because their argument strategy or method of dealing with confrontation is identical to how the Witch Hunters and Inquisitors of yore dealt with their enemies.
If you know ANYTHING about these groups, you already know that for the victims, it was a "lose-lose" situation.
You see, the strategy of
those requiring confessions was simple:
For the Inquisitors the targets needed to "admit their guilt (heresy) to be saved." If they protested and insisted on their innocence- they were DEFINITELY guilty and their soul was to be damned to Hell." If they admitted their "guilt," they usually still faced an unpleasant fate, as there was to be no rest for the wicked and the blasphemers!
For the Witch Hunters, their tactics were a little
different but the results were the same:
"If we TORTURE you and you LIVE-- you're a witch.
If we TORTURE you and you DIE, then you were innocent."
So, basically, to the Inquisitor/Witch Hunter---we are
already guilty. Even, if we "win"-- we're already dead. We cannot
win.
Once this type of person has decided on our fate or
intentions, our arguments in trying to prove that we're right or innocent are
just more proof that we're lying.
They may even SAY to us that by continuing to argue with
them --we're just showing them that we are guilty. If we end the argument by
not responding or by giving up, we STILL have only proven that they were right
all along. Our lack of argument is also proof that we were wrong in the first
place.
It is easy to see the Inquisitor/Witch Hunter as pompous or
self-righteous. How dare they never think that THEY could be wrong! How dare
they determine that their insight on any topic or into any discussion is so
much richer, deeper and more thorough than ours!
I submit, though, that it is NOT arrogance or
self-righteousness that compels them. It is, rather, insecurity that prevents them from allowing
us the “win” we deserve. A loss for them is a BIG deal. It is a blow to their
whole concept of self. Therefore, in order to successfully relate to them, we
must assure them that they ARE still important and that we DO value their
opinion and input.
Otherwise, we may find ourselves on an endless loop of
hostile accusations and unresolved tension.
Stay tuned for the next entry. Next up, we will discuss "The Martyr." FUN TIMES!
#bloggers #people #life
#bloggers #people #life